rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

The NS NDP introduces an energy tax rebate: In whose interest?

The NS legislature reopened this week, but the NS NDP has already been busy following through on some of its election promises. One of these was to institute an energy tax rebate making life more affordable for families. But does it?

In an interview about the energy tax rebate, Premier Darrell Dexter suggested that this was important because ‘the necessities of life should not be taxed.'

Electricity costs are indeed a necessity, but whether basic necessities are taxed is beside the point. The point really is whether basic necessities are available and accessible to all who need them.

According to the government, an 8% rebate on residential power bills will amount to saving an average of $10 per month. This is not a significant saving for those who are struggling to pay their bills.

It is, however, a significant loss of revenue to the government of approximately $15 million this year and $30 million next year. Should energy costs continue to increase, as they have, by about 9.5% on average per year, this program could cost the government more than it is projecting and barely offset electricity cost increases for the consumer.

A better program would be targeted to those who need help the most, such as a guarantee of the cost of electricity via a subsidy to ensure it remains affordable.

In contrast, an across the board energy rebate also benefits those who are not struggling to pay their bills; those who have high energy costs because they choose to own large homes, for example. This program will also benefit landlords who may or may not pass on savings to their tenants.

While this program will not likely result in an increased consumption of unnecessary electricity, there is also a risk that without sufficient energy reduction programs, this incentive will increase greenhouse gas emissions. The $1 million investment in the proposed energy retrofit (1,000 home insulation grants) pales in comparison to this program.

As it stands, the government's new program raises more questions than it answers, or solves.
Where does this program leave those who are most vulnerable to the sudden increases in the costs of energy? Where does it leave those who are struggling to secure the other basic necessities?

The best use of limited government resources is to begin to address the fundamental problems at the root of high electricity costs and some people's inability to pay their bills. We need, for example, investments in energy efficiencies and the aging housing stock - Nova Scotia has one of the oldest housing stocks in the country. Ultimately, as has been previously pointed out by the CCPA-NS, we need our province to be more energy secure and not so reliant on imported energy supplies.

We also need investments in poverty reduction so that low-income people are not being forced to choose which of the necessities of life they can afford this month. Finally, we need to have meaningful discussion about our tax system and about who should pay how much and for what. Tinkering with a regressive system by offering tax rebates only exacerbates the inequities. Let's stop tinkering and make some bold policy choices that will be in the best interest of all Nova Scotians.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.