rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Alberta community astonished to find itself at centre of national controversy

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

St. Albert's Akinsdale neighbourhood

ST. ALBERT, Alberta

People who live in the Edmonton bedroom community of St. Albert -- where a controversy over a planned Habitat for Humanity project has been brewing for weeks -- were shocked to learn over the holiday weekend their local argument had become a national news story.

Residents of St. Albert’s modest Akinsdale neighbourhood were astonished to find themselves portrayed across Canada -- and as far away as the Middle East -- as a bunch of wealthy toffs who didn’t want ordinary working stiffs living on their street.

This was a shocker in large part because Akinsdale isn’t a particularly upscale neighbourhood. Whatever the pros and cons of the Habitat development proposed for 70 Arlington Drive may be, as of last weekend you could still buy a residence in Akinsdale for $142,000. By any reasonable Canadian yardstick, that’s a working class neighbourhood.

So when Akinsdale residents came home from work Thursday afternoon, looking forward to the long weekend, they knew about the community battle over the merits of a planned building project on a plot of land most of them had supposed was a park, its zoning notwithstanding.

But aside from their wish to retain a popular green space, most of the neighbours on Arlington Drive and nearby streets seem to have been motivated by concerns about parking in their neighbourhood, the number of units proposed for such a small space (58), and distrust of the developer’s motives.

However, by Saturday -- thanks to an eye-popping letter to the editor that appeared in that day’s edition of the twice-weekly St. Albert Gazette – the story had become a national issue. The residents of Akinsdale’s modest homes were being characterized from coast to coast as the heartless rich ready to fight off a working-class apocalypse in their midst.

In reality, most residents of this city of 60,000 surely choked on their breakfasts or spat coffee on the table Saturday morning when they opened their free copy of the Gazette to find the remarkable missive from Chris and Karleena Perry.

The Perrys live in St. Albert’s genuinely upscale new Kingswood neighbourhood -- a corner of town where three properties were listed last weekend at more than a million dollars. They live quite some distance from Akinsdale -- economically and geographically -- so one could argue they don’t have a dog in this fight.

Still, they were apparently happy to contribute their astonishing opinions -- to wit, by the sound of it, that people of ordinary means have no place in St. Albert.

As the oldest non-fortified community in the province, St. Albert has been home over the years to quite a few people, rich and poor alike. The Perrys, however, didn’t see things that way. “We moved to St. Albert because we can afford it and we deserve it,” they wrote in their now famous letter. “We feel comfortable joining in activities we would not have considered in Edmonton.”

“Like it or not, the children of St. Albert are high-standard children and have no place for low-income classmates,” they added at another point.

By expressing these views, they pushed one of St. Albert’s political hot buttons: the fear of many citizens of ordinary means, and especially seniors living on fixed incomes, that they are being pushed aside by residents of expensive new developments like Kingswood who don’t care how high local taxes go or how much it costs to use community facilities.

This may account in part for the large number of critical responses -- some extremely harsh -- that St. Albert residents left anywhere the story popped up.

In truth, many of us in St. Albert first thought the letter was an April Fool’s joke, accidentally run two days late. Apparently not. Well, if nothing else, those of us who have been in St. Albert for a while can credit these folks with charming naiveté if they truly believe our streets are free of crime and our schools without drugs. If only!

Sad to say, there is probably more than one person in St. Albert who shares the Perrys’ opinions -- although most of those who do have the good sense to keep it to themselves.

Unfortunately for St. Albert, the Perrys’ appalling epistle was soon Tweeted ’round the world. A link showed up on Maclean’s Magazine’s Website, and from there the story went national, and beyond.

As a result, St. Albertans must expect a certain amount of mockery and distain for our alleged “inhumanity.” (And this in an Alberta city that has the unusual distinction of having elected both NDP and Liberal MLAs!)

Well, so be it. This is a story with a little complexity, and mainstream media doesn’t do complexity. In the mean time, however, the letter has had one positive effect: St. Albertans are now talking and thinking seriously about poverty in our community.

David Climenhaga is a resident of St. Albert. An earlier version of this Rabble post -- which he imagined would be of interest only to a few people within the community -- is found on his blog, AlbertaDiary.ca. This item has received more visits than any post in the life of the blog, and includes some enlightening comments, as well as a few that are not so enlightening. It also includes several photos of the neighbourhood where the development is planned.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.