rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Now that CAPP's president has called for quick energy royalty review, Wildrose and PC leaders will fall into line

Tim McMillan

Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

While Alberta's New Democratic Party government has been pushing ahead with its plan to review the royalties paid by the energy industry, widely thought to be among the lowest on the planet, the province's two conservative opposition parties have been screaming for the review to be shelved.

The royalty review is "dangerous," protested Wildrose Opposition Leader Brian Jean, accusing Premier Rachel Notley of "putting ideology above good government," which is a bit of a chuckle considering who leads the most ideologically driven political party in this province.

"They're doing everything in their power to put business out of business," screeched Progressive Conservative interim Leader Ric McIver, rolling in a complaint about the NDP's modest increase in the province's business tax to a still-low 12 per cent and accusing Notley of tailoring her party's policies to the campaign needs of federal NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair, whom McIver insultingly refers to as the premier's "boss."

The always-supportive Edmonton Sun hyperventilated in a headline on an editorial that "Alberta is on a cliff," and begged, "don't push it off with royalty review."

All this is about to change, however, now that Jean's and McIver's boss at the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers has spoken up and told the two of them, in effect, to shut the [BLANK] up.

Tim McMillan, president of Canada's aggressive and well-financed oilpatch lobbying organization, told the Calgary Herald yesterday that the energy industry doesn't want the NDP government to put its planned review of Alberta's energy royalties on hold.

On the contrary, McMillan said, with the price of oil dipping below $40 per barrel this week, it's time to get on with the review as quickly as possible -- not that the Alberta oil industry will ever be very interested in actually paying higher royalties like those that used to exist in Alberta when Ralph Klein came to power.

The reason for this should have been pretty obvious to anyone who was paying attention, which the leaders of Alberta's two opposition conservative parties clearly weren't. That's because, from the perspective of the oil industry, there could hardly be a better time for a review of energy royalties than when oil prices are already in the toilet and heading for the sewer pipe!

Indeed, it would be a wonderment if the top dogs in the energy industry aren't on their knees thanking whatever deity they worship that the NDP got elected when it did on a promise to review royalties. After all, they are people who, unlike the Wildrose and PC leaders, actually do pay attention to what's going on around them.

And we are living at a moment in history when it would be hard to make a stronger argument made for keeping royalties pretty much where they are.

Moreover, those energy industry top dogs are not without political savvy of their own, so they also understand that once the rates are set, the NDP is unlikely to want to revisit the question for a long, long time.

Imagine what might have happened if oil were still trading where it was a year ago! Wouldn't that strengthen the calls from NDP supporters for higher royalties, implemented faster, than the present situation, which is likely temporary given the world's balance of petroleum supply and demand?

This realization almost certainly accounts for the moderate language used by McMillan, who is obviously no dummy, to describe the NDP's planned review, which will be headed by ATB Financial President Dave Mowat. Mowat was appointed in late June by Alberta Energy Minister Marg McCuaig-Boyd. The full panel is expected to be named by the government any day now.

McMillan, a former Saskatchewan Party energy minister who presumably knows a thing or two about politics himself, assured the Herald's Editorial Board yesterday that the industry understands the New Democrats have a strong mandate to review royalties and encourages them to get on with it.

Word is bound to quickly filter down to the Sun's and other Postmedia editorial boards that they should tone down their hysteria about the royalty review now that the Herald has its marching orders. Likewise, even if it's just the teensiest bit unfair to call McMillan the Opposition leaders' boss, we can nevertheless expect the Wildrose and PC leaders to quickly zip their lips about how the royalty review must, simply must, be stopped.

In fact, if this had happened slightly sooner -- say, if former Progressive Conservative leader Jim Prentice had asked energy companies to pay, in Notley's phrase, "just a little bit more" -- McIver's party might well still be the government of Alberta!

And if the former PC government had really been paying attention, they would have let another premier, Ed Stelmach, proceed with his proposed royalty increases back in 2007.

Stelmach, it can be argued persuasively with the benefit of 20/20 hindsight, pretty much got it right.

This post also appears on David Climenhaga's blog, AlbertaPolitics.ca.

Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.