I was at a conference recently where someone with a degree in science repeated the erroneous claim that humans use 10 per cent of their brains. I was shocked that someone with scientific training would make such a statement and I wondered both about the quality of the science degree and about this person's ability to think critically.
What is the origin of this fallacious claim? William James wrote in The Energies of Men (1907) that "We are making use of only a small part of our possible mental and physical resources." (Some believe that Einstein commented on this myth, attributing his intellectual gifts to using more than 10 per cent of his brain. There is no evidence he made such a statement.)
That was over 100 years ago, when we knew less about the human brain than we know now, yet this 10 per cent myth endures. Why?
Perhaps it's the desire to believe that we have untapped potential, waiting for the next evolutionary step or unlocking of superhuman abilities. That by employing a greater percentage of our grey matter, humans will become telepaths and telekinetics (of course, laws of nature will also have to be suspended). Paranormal piffle one hears as money is drained from one's wallet. Fantastical stuff, but not rooted in reality.
There may be people who seem to use 10 per cent or less of their brains, but every part of the brain is active nearly all the time. Imaging technology has found that 100 per cent of the brain is used over a 24-hour period. Even during sleep, the brain is active, just in a different state than when humans are awake.
In addition to evidence found in imaging technology if only 10 per cent of the brain were in use, then 90 per cent of the brain could sustain damage without loss of normal functioning. However, most areas of the brain, if damaged, result in varying degrees of impairment.
There's also evolution. The brain is an energy-intensive organ; a three-pound metabolic monster consuming nearly 20 per cent of the body's energy in the form of oxygen and glucose. If 90 per cent of the brain were extraneous, then Homo sapiens would not have evolved with the cranial capacity it has today; natural selection would favour smaller, more efficient brains.
I applaud anyone who strives to exercise her/his brain; who wants to learn more, read more, employ critical thinking more. Indeed, if we devote time to cultivating reason, nonsense like the 10 per cent brain myth would whither away.
Thank you for reading this story…
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.
rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.
So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.
And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.