rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Daily Pulse: Dissecting the Baucus Bill

Yesterday, a long and pathetic spectacle came to an end. Sen. Max Baucus (D-Mont) released the first draft of the Senate Finance Committee’s health care bill.

After months of fruitless negotiation in search of elusive bipartisanship, Baucus delivered a bill with no Republican support. You’d scarcely know it to read the bill. As Tim Fernholtz observes on TAPPED, the Baucus bill looks like a retread of the Republican alternative to Clinton’s health care plan.

Sure enough, the Baucus bill is a boon to the insurance industry. The government would force people to buy more of the same expensive, crappy private insurance that necessitated reform in the first place. Instead of driving down costs through competition with a public option, Baucus wants the government subsidies to help people buy bad insurance they can’t afford. That’s not the free market. In capitalism, if your product is too expensive, people don’t buy it. Under Baucusism, the government forces you to buy insurance and kicks in some money to help you afford it.

As expected, the bill contains no public option. Instead, the bill calls for 50 state insurance co-ops to bargain for better rates—but the bill hobbles the co-ops by restricting their enrollment and bargaining power. If the goal is to drive down prices, you want the biggest possible co-op to drive the hardest possible bargain. So, anything that keeps co-ops smaller or restricts their ability to negotiate undermines the exercise. Which proves once again that the Baucus and the Blue Dogs only care about holding down costs when the money is coming out of the pockets of the big business contributors.

Individuals must have insurance, but employers are under no obligation to offer it. Companies would pay a fee if they did offer insurance and workers and the workers ended up getting public subsidies instead, but not the full cost of the subsidy. So, the taxpayers would be subsidizing employers who won’t do right by their employees.

The Baucus bill throws down the gauntlet on organized labor by calling for a 35% tax on high-quality health insurance plans. The tax could raise $200 billion, but as McJoan explains at AlterNet, it’s a giant middle class tax hike that hits union workers the hardest.

Luckily, nothing is set in stone. This is just the first draft of one of the Senate bills. The Baucus bill will have to be combined with the much more liberal bill passed by what was then Sen. Ted Kennedy’s (D-Mass) Health Education Labor and Pensions Committee. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid is already signalling that the final bill will look very different by the time the full senate is called to vote on it.

This post features links to the best independent, progressive reporting about health care and is free to reprint. Visit Healthcare.newsladder.net for a complete list of articles on health care affordability, health care laws, and health care controversy. For the best progressive reporting on the Economy, and Immigration, check out Economy.Newsladder.net and Immigration.Newsladder.net. This is a project of The Media Consortium, a network of 50 leading independent media outlets, and created by NewsLadder.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.