rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Women's share of wealth and power in Canada, by the numbers

Photo: Gavin Schaefer/Flickr

On the occasion of International Women's Day, we ask: Are more women making it to the top in Canada? And what does that mean for the 100 per cent? The 2013 edition, by the numbers. (All data are most recently available statistics.)

1 out of 5: 21 per cent of the people in the top 1 per cent of income earners were women 2010 (total incomes over $201,400). In 1982: 1 in 10 (11 per cent) (Source)

18 per cent: Women's share of income of the top 1 per cent in 2010. In 1982: 11 per cent (Source)

34 per cent: Income of top-1-per-cent women that came from paid work in 2010. In 1982: 13 per cent (Men: 73.5 per cent in 2010, 61 per cent in 1982) (Source)

68 per cent: Women in top 1 per cent who were married or living common-law in 2010. In 1982: 50 per cent (Men: 87 per cent in 2010, 88 per cent in 1982) (Source)

14.5 per cent: Proportion of seats on corporate boards occupied by women in Canada. (Source) In 2003: 11.2 per cent (Source)

8 per cent: Proportion of women holding "top executive jobs". In 2005: 4.6 per cent (Source)

1: Number of women CEOs in Canada's Top 100 Corporations (Source) In 1998: 0 (Source: Hardcopy edition of Globe and Mail's Top 100 index)

24 per cent: Proportion of women in House of Commons today. (Source) In 1998: 20.3 per cent (Source)

16.8 per cent: Proportion of women in government caucus today. (Source) In 1998: 23.2 per cent (Source)

23.7 per cent: Proportion of women in federal cabinet today (9 of 38). (Source) In 1998: 32.1 per cent (9 of 28) (Source)

36.5 per cent: Proportion of women in Senate today. (Source) In 1998: 26.9 per cent (Source)

1: Number of women who have been Prime Minister (Kim Campbell, PC, for 4 months, 9 days) (Source)

0: Number of women who have been Finance Minister

30 per cent: Benchmark for critical mass of women in decision-making (Source)

6: Number of premiers in Canada who are women today. (Source) (governing 87.7 per cent of Canada's population, Source) In 2000: 1 (Yukon, accounting for 0.1 per cent of Canada's population) (Source)

50.7 per cent: Proportion of Canadian population aged 15 and over who are women (Source)

47.4 per cent: Proportion of income tax payers who were women in 2010. (Source) In 1982: 39.3 per cent (Source: Taxation Statistics from Revenue Canada, hardcopy)

62.2 per cent: Proportion of women aged 15 and over in the labour market today. In 1976: 45.7 per cent (Source)

64.4 per cent: Proportion of women with children under age 3 who were working in 2009. In 1976: 27.6 per cent (Source)

49.8 per cent: Proportion of employees who are women today. In 1976: 38.6 per cent (Source)

35.7 per cent: Proportion of self-employed who are women today. In 1976: 26.3 per cent (Source)

44.2 per cent: Share of total income of the bottom 99 per cent going to women in 2010. In 1982: 33.5 per cent (Source)

60 per cent: Share of total income of the bottom 50 per cent going to women in 2010. In 1982: 57.9 per cent (Source)

$3.57: Average amount by women earned less per hour than men for full-time work in Canada in 2012 (ranges from parity in PEI to $5.79 an hour in Alberta) (Source)

(Since 1997, the pay gap has decreased by between 11 per cent and 100 per cent in inflation-adjusted terms everywhere but in Alberta -- where it has grown)

More: Amount of unpaid work inside and outside the home (Source) -- though it's converging over time (Source)

Less: Amount of bickering and ch-ck-a-bow-bow if there was more gender equality (Source)

Beyond just the facts, ma'am:

Here's a provocative and unvarnished discussion about whether we still need "binders full of women" to find qualified female experts to step up to the plate, and make their voices heard, to and from the top.

Here's a provocative and unvarnished essay, written by a woman on top, that says women can't have it all.

So what does it mean if there are more women on top? More power? More money? More influence? Does it matter? You decide. Happy International Women's Day!

Armine Yalnizyan is Senior Economist with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. This article was first published in the Globe and Mail and is reprinted here with permission.

Photo: Gavin Schaefer/Flickr

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.