rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Underlying losses frame 2013 Toronto city budget

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

This year’s budget ended as it began -- difficult to define and understand. It provided the Mayor and his allies with an opportunity to claim victory for their austerity agenda. It provided some important wins, which once again demonstrated the importance and impact of community organizing. In comparison to the process and proposals in the 2012 Budget, it provided a veneer of increased cooperation, compromise and shared understanding of what the City needs.

Passing with much less comment, was a profound shift in the way that the City’s capital expenditures are financed. In a period of historic low interest rates, with a yawning infrastructure deficit, the administration’s focus on reduced debt and financing capital out of operating expenditures is incomprehensible. To understand the folly of this perspective it is important to remember that the City, unlike the provinces or the federal government, cannot run an operating deficit and must balance its operating budget every year. Any debt that the City takes on is therefore for capital expenditures.  And, these expenditures, by definition, have long useful lives that are rightly paid for over a  number of  years (a life guard at a city swimming pool is an operating expenditure while the pool itself is a capital expenditure).

Insisting that capital expenditures be paid for out of current revenues, and without taking on more debt, defy fundamental principles of both accounting and public finance. It  is the equivalent of a family insisting that a mortgage is an irresponsible way to buy a home,  and that the only home you can truly afford is one that you can pay for with cash.

This approach does a disservice both to our city’s need for capital expenditures and operating spending. There are two ways in which the 2013 budget redirects spending away from services and toward capital. The first is the use of the entire 2012 surplus for capital expenditures, whereas over the last 5 years $50 to $350 million of the prior year’s surplus was used for operating spending. The capital budget and plan shows a move even further down this road of supporting capital expenditures at the expense of services. It shows a move away from debt financing and toward financing capital from the operating budget.


The programs that received enhanced funding in this budget will have important, positive health impacts. They include: increases to the grants that fund essential community services across this city, limited increases in access to recreation, and student nutrition programs, among others.  We should, however, be clear about the scale of these successes – a $12 million increase in spending on a $9.4 billion budget is less than one half of one percentage point. This budget means that the services that our City relies on will continue to erode.

This erosion of real, per capita services will have a longer-term impact on our City, as will under investment in infrastructure.  As we close the books on this budget, we can hope for a better result next year. Perhaps the report on the transparency of the budget process that we can expect from Councillor Mihevc’s motion will support a deeper discussion of capital financing and better outcomes.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.