All-encompassing surveillance or 21st-century citizenship?

Please chip in to support rabble's election 2019 coverage. Support today for as little as $1 per month!

It's time to re-imagine the role of both citizens and government. We need a future where governments are more permeable and where citizens are better equipped to govern themselves.

In many ways, the process to re-imagine citizenship and governance seems to be well underway. Citizens are newly empowered by online tools, and governments seem to be evolving in order to facilitate deeper civic participation. Sometimes, that process is expressed through enlightened governments opening their activities to the public, such as when the city of Vancouver adopted its openness motion. Other times, the catalyst for this change comes in the form of public pressure in reaction to a poorly thought-out government decision.

The latter appears to be at play concerning the Conservative Party's impending online spying legislation. I've written before about how the legislation, if passed, will allow a range of "authorities" to use the Internet (including mobile devices) to collect our private information without a warrant. For example, if you post something on a website that also houses a comment from someone a security agent is concerned about, your private data could be caught up in a digital dragnet and entered into an Internet registry of private data.

If and when this happens you'll probably never even find out that your information is sitting in an insecure database somewhere. If you think the government can keep your sensitive information secure you may want to take a look a look at the recent case of the Alberta government mistakenly publishing the identity of a mother and daughter who had changed their identity to escape domestic abuse. If governments are unable to effectively protect information of this level of severity, how are they going to secure all the random data police and other officials will be dragging off the web through "lawful access"?

This legislation is excessive, expensive and downright bizarre. If we care about privacy, the open Internet, and our basic democratic rights -- it's time to show Public Safety Minister Vic Toews that jamming online spying down our throats has repercussions. Forcing ISPs to install and employ costly online surveillance infrastructure takes Canada in the wrong direction -- a dangerous move during an already economically precarious time.

This government wants to achieve "natural governing party" status. If they want to earn that status, they must show respect for Canadians. When they don't, we need to speak up and let them know that there are political consequences for their irresponsible actions.

Recognizing the power of engaged Canadians, the Conservatives did to their credit, respond quickly on the issue of Internet metering earlier this year; backed by the voices nearly of half-a-million Canadians and all major political parties, the Conservatives sent the CRTC back to the drawing board on key pricing rules for independent Internet Service Providers (ISPs).

That decision worked out very well for Conservatives -- they temporarily shifted the blame for the dismal state of Canada's telecom market onto the CRTC, making it seem as if the CRTC is solely responsible for Canada's telecom market being one of the worst of all industrialized countries. Many Canadians saw the Conservatives as heroes when they told the CRTC to reconsider its rules that would allow big telecom companies to impose Internet metering on nearly all Canadian Internet users.

If the Conservatives learned anything at all from that experience, they'll move swiftly to adapt their online spying legislation so it's in line with the will of Canadians. We'll have to wait and see, but the clock is definitely ticking. The Conservatives made an election promise to ram through their online spying (what they call "lawful access") legislation within the first 100 sitting days of Parliament.

This legislation is reckless and irresponsible. We need to make clear that using our personal information without our permission is unacceptable. Proposals to expand telecommunications surveillance must be based on a clear need for new powers, demonstrated through verifiable evidence.

We need to send a clear message: When our representatives take a swipe at our privacy and digital economy with no public consultation, there will be consequences. Canadians can speak out at

Steve Anderson is the National Coordinator of

Reach him at:

Media Links is a syndicated column supported by CommonGround, TheTyee,, and VUE Weekly.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable. has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.