What should Canadians think of the G8 meetings last week in Kananaskis? They could just treat the whole photo-op for the worlds most important leaders as a relatively ho-hum event, livened up by anti-globalization demonstrators. But it might be a good idea to closely examine this self-appointed forum of the powerful.
While its legitimacy now seems beyond question, what gives these powerful politicians any moral authority in world affairs? Simply, power. And they declare their legitimacy because there is no one around to challenge it.
Here we have eight countries who have arrogated to themselves the lofty role of deciding how the world will be run.
This is not multilateralism or democracy that role is supposed to be played by the United Nations (UN). No, this is effectively a dictatorship of some nations over all others. Except members of this exclusive club now prefer to call themselves economies. That may seem an esoteric point, except that it reveals a lot about our current world, one in which nation states are being systematically weakened in their capacity to act in the interests of their citizens and communities.
But, of course, not all nation states are seeing their sovereignty eroded. Despite all the hype about leading economies, globalization and the borderless world, the United States has no plans to abandon its status as a nation-state. Indeed, as the only superpower remaining in the world it is becoming increasingly comfortable even enthusiastic about the idea of being an empire.
Journalist, Emily Eakin recently identified this trend for the International Herald Tribune. The American conservative columnist, Charles Krauthammer, stated: People are now coming out of the closet on the word empire. The fact is no country has been as dominant culturally, economically, technologically and militarily in the history of the world since the Roman Empire.
The Wall Street Journals Max Boot wrote: Afghanistan and other troubled lands today cry out for the sort of enlightened foreign administration once provided by self-confident Englishmen in jodphurs and pith helmets. Journalist Robert Kaplan opined: ... future historians will look back on 21st-century United States as an empire as well as a republic ...
This development the systematic erosion of nation state sovereignty globally, while the empire-republic enhances its power is a formula for disaster. It is particularly dangerous for Canada, which for fifteen years has followed a deliberate policy of tying itself to the U.S. under the illusion this will guarantee its future.
It may instead ensure Canadas demise as a distinct nation and community. In fact, what Canadians witnessed at Kananaskis is not the meeting of the G8 but the first unabashed gathering of the G1.
At no time in world history has there been such a disparity of power between a dominant empire and the rest of the world. Of course it could be argued that this American dominance is nothing new just the end point of the evolution of the G7, which was initiated by the U.S. in the first place (and expanded in 1999 to include Russia).
It has been, primarily, a tool of American foreign and economic policy since it was founded in 1975 by U.S. President Gerald Ford.
As it turned out, the G7 was to become the implementation committee of the Washington Consensus, the new elite consensus free trade, deregulation, privatization and deep cuts to social spending that developed out of institutions like the Trilateral Commission (TLC) and World Economic Forum (WEF). While the TLC and WEF gave broad definition to the new consensus, the G7 made it operational.
And perhaps the most important initiative of the G7 was the creation of the World Trade Organization (WTO), the most powerful global institution ever created, one that enjoys world government powers the UN can only dream of.
It is, of course, world government in the narrowest sense: it enforces the property rights of transnational corporations against the sovereign authority of democratic nation states.
At the 1981 summit held in Ottawa, the G7 leaders formed what would become a key organization in the formation of global trade policy and agencies. Called the Trade Ministers Quadrilateral, now known simply as the Quad, it is the self-appointed executive committee of the WTO and it blithely sets the WTO agenda and imposes it on the other 137 member countries.
Canada plays a key role in the Quad bullying and is now seen by developing countries as no different than the U.S.
The agenda pushed by the G7 has been catastrophic for Third World countries. Between 1960 and 1980 most of the countries in Latin America and Africa were either welfare statist or socialist pursuing policies of public ownership and import substitution and growing economically. The Washington Consensus policies imposed by the G-7 and its agencies, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), The World Bank and WTO, dramatically reversed that record growth.
Between 1960 and 1980 per capita income in Latin America grew 73 per cent, and in Africa, 34 per cent. During the period of economic liberalization, 1980 to 2000, that growth plummeted to 7 per cent in Latin America and in Africa it went into reverse minus 23 per cent.
These numbers put into perspective Canadas Prime Minister, Jean Chretiens highly publicized support for a new" plan for African development. Known as the New Partnership for Africas Development (NEPAD) its lofty aim is to eradicate poverty and to place African countries on a path of sustainable growth and development. But NEPAD is little more than a joke. The new plan is just more of the same more open markets, more privatization, more deregulation and more grand lies about debt forgiveness.
All the pomp and ceremony surrounding the meeting in Kananaskis would suggest serious democratic leaders grappling with intractable problems. The trouble is, the problems were created by this same gang. These are not statesmen. They are more like a political Hells Angels biker gang handing out toys to poor kids at Christmas to polish their image all the while running a protection racket for the worlds most powerful corporations.
Canadians should be outraged at what these so-called leaders were up to on Canadian soil with respect to the Third World. And as for Canadas future as a nation, if the government does not actively resist American arrogance and unilateralism, it will be dragged into supporting whatever new adventures the U.S. is planning.
Always, Canadians should demand a national debate about our relationship with our imperial neighbour to the south.
Thank you for reading this story…
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.
rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.
So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.
And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.