What's interesting about this is not just that Van Jones is a CNN correspondent and a former senior staffer for the Obama administration, sometimes called their "green jobs czar." No, what was really interesting is that he was standing shoulder to shoulder with the coal miners fighting to defend their pensions from a hugely wealthy coal company.
You may have expected that he would be arrested opposing the coal itself, fighting the causes of climate change and dangerous pollution. Indeed Van is outspoken about phasing out coal as well as all fossil fuels. As the keynote speaker at last year's BC NDP convention, he called fossil fuels "energy made from death".
Given his strong feelings in regards to the need to get off fossil fuels you may expect that he would be more likely to be involved in the protests against the Keystone XL pipeline at the White House --and he has been -- but last week he was standing shoulder to shoulder with the workers inside the fossil fuel industry, fighting for their rights.
I defended Van Jones as he was attacked on Twitter for what some saw as an inconsistent position. In response to one post I posed the question, "Why is it so hard to believe that he cares about people and the environment"?
As long as there is a fight between the economy and the environment everyone is going to lose one way or another. We need more people like Van Jones, and it turns out there are a number of them running in the current B.C. election.
As a former deputy leader and organizer for the Green Party and a runner up in the last leadership race, some folks have been surprised by my endorsement of some NDP candidates and my stated hope that the NDP will form the next B.C. government.
My goal has always been to find the best ways to make progress on environmental and social justice issues, not simply partisan politics. One of the things that drew me to the Green Party was the sentiment expressed by the leadership that the party existed to shift the debate and the encouragement for other parties to "steal our policies". I am glad that the Greens have influenced the debate and that the parties most likely to form government are indeed borrowing from their policies. Now the question we must ask is, "Who is best suited to actually make these policies a reality?"
These days, I work for an environmental campaigning organization called ForestEthics Advocacy. I strongly believe that in a democracy the real power comes from the grassroots, and politicians will ultimately follow the leadership of the people. The West Coast is a magnet for those who love the environment and feel a responsibility to be environmental stewards. Any party hoping to be elected in BC needs to prove to the electorate that they will act on these broadly shared ethics.
The environmental movement has been asking for a strong position against the Enbridge and Kinder Morgan tar sands oil pipelines. It's been our biggest movement-wide "ask" in the months and years leading up to the election, and the NDP has stepped up and taken on the position we asked them to take. I think we need to acknowledge that the NDP has listened to this demand from the people of the province and has taken on the challenge of fighting off some of the world's wealthiest oil corporations, their billionaire owners and their best political ally, Prime Minister Stephen Harper. This is no small task and they need us to have their back in this fight.
We need people like George Heyman, the former Executive Director of the Sierra Club of BC, to get elected. George was also the president of the BCGEU, and was a progressive voice within the labour movement. He, like Van Jones, is the kind of guy that not only gets the need for environmental sustainability but he can legitimately bridge the gap between sectors and bring forward policies that create the kind of good local jobs we can be proud of.
At ForestEthics Advocacy we are actively supporting a handful of candidates we are calling "champions for the coast." Like George these are good people that will make great MLAs and strong advocates for solutions that work for people and the planet. George Heyman, Janet Routledge, Claire Trevena, Jennifer Rice and David Eby are the kind of people that deserve your vote regardless of what party they are running for.
In the last election the NDP lost in George's riding by a margin of only five per cent, a smaller number than the Green party's nine per cent tally.
The polls indicate that the NDP is most likely to form the next government in B.C. but there is no guarantee that the candidates who have gone the extra mile for our issues will win in their ridings.
Please think carefully about your vote before you make it. Take a close look at who the candidates are in your riding.
In his newest book Van Jones reminds us that the key to achieving progressive policies is a strategy of "no let up, no let down".
It's not simply enough to elect the better party in this election. The social movements that led to the NDP's position on tar sands pipelines need to continue to work hard on this issue and a number of other issues that deserve more attention from all of us; for example, stopping the increase of coal exports from the United States moving through B.C. ports.
The NDP has shown that they are a party we can work with. We may not get everything we want, but what is important is they have made it clear they are committed to addressing the causes of climate change. That's a very important baseline for moving forward.
The fact that Adrian Dix brought Van Jones to speak at their first convention with him as the leader was a good indication of the approach this party is open to taking on these issues. Let's work together with the party to support an economy in B.C. that matches our values.
On May 14 I hope you will vote for the candidates and the party most likely to say "Yes" to green jobs and say "No" to bad ideas like the Enbridge and Kinder Morgan pipelines.
Ben West is Tar Sands Campaign Director at Forest Ethics Advocacy.
Thank you for reading this story…
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.
rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.
So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.
And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.