Bill C-30

On Valentine's Day 2012, Conservative Public Safety minister Vic Toews along with Justice Minister Rob Nicholson introduced Bill C-30, originally named the Lawful Access Act. An hour later, the bill's name was changed to Protecting Children from Internet Predators Act. This happened in the wake of SOAPA in the United States, a bill that also proposed letting police have more access and power online.

What was it

Bill C-30 would grant new powers to authorities to monitor the online activity of Canadians in real time like never before. This would require service providers to grant access to personal records of costumers, and allow police to access personal information and digital activity without receiving a warrant. This means that for no reason at all, police could force telecommunications companies to divulge information of anonymous users and use real time wire-tapping without any kind of mechanism for parliamentary or company based oversight. You could be heavily investigated online or through your mobile and never even know it.

It wouldn't just be the RCMP who would have access either. CSIS and anyone appointed by Vic Toews would also be allowed to spy on citizens without cause. They would also be allowed to make copies of the information from their snooping. Telecommunications companies would not be able to alert customers that they are being investigated.

Naturally, the bill has drew criticisms. Even though other than the title, the bill doesn't mention internet predators or protecting children, the guise of saving children was used to defend the legislation. Every other political party than the Harper Conservatives denounced the bill as an infringement on the privacy of Canadians.

 

History

This isn't the first time such a bill has been brought before the House. In fact, since the late 1990s, "lawful access" legislation has been proposed to allow police unrestricted access to monitor Canadians. It was first suggested by the Liberal government in 1999. It did not succeed, though the concept of internet surveillance has been consistent throughout bills submitted in 2005, 2009 and 2010.

The closest call before this piece of legislation were bills C-50, C-51 and C-52 that were abandoned through the dissolution of Parliament in the 2011 federal election. Many legal groups, including the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association have spoken out against C-30, calling it unconstitutional, as it would be unlawful search and seizure of digital information.

Activism

Protests took to the web to fight back. A twitter account named vikileaks30 started in response, publishing details of Vic Toew's divorce. Though criticized with doing exactly what the bill could do to Canadians, the account has garnered a lot of attention to the problematic bill. Another twitter protest #tellvictoewseverything involves folks tweeting mundane occurrences in their lives @victoews en masse. The reasoning is that the bill would give the authorities access to this private information, so you might as well tell the minister anyways.

The hacker group Anonymous also spoke out against the bill, threatening to embarrass Canadian politicians if the bill continues through Parliament as is. They refered to their operation as White North.

Though Toews backed down from his original ‘with us or against us' mentality, the Conservatives attempted to sneak straight from first reading to second reading without going to committee.

Outcome

Thanks to public outcry and protest, the bill was axed on February 11, 2013. For more on internet privacy and what you can do, check out Open Media. 

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.